It's surprising that Patrick Cockburn, a veteran Middle East correspondent, should have asserted on Sunday in the London Independent that "The mounting crisis in [Yemen] attracted notice only when a Nigerian student is revealed to have been 'trained' in Yemen by al-Qa'ida to detonate explosives in his underpants on a plane heading for Detroit," and that "this botched attack has led to the U.S. and Britain starting to become entangled in one of the more violent countries in the world." -- Nothing could be further from the truth. -- In fact, AP reported on Dec. 24, the day before Abdulmutallab's attack, on "a strategy shift that occurred about a year ago, when the United States determined that the two key centers in the fight against al-Qaida are Yemen, located on the southern tip of the Saudi Arabian peninsula, and Pakistan." ...
ARMING YEMEN WOULD PLAY INTO AL-QA'IDA's HANDS
By Patrick Cockburn
** An unpopular government, tribal fiefdoms, and Western aid make it easy for al-Qa'ida to grow in this ravaged country on the Arabian peninsula **
January 10, 2010
Protesters are walking confidently down a street in the southern Yemeni port of Aden when there is a rattle of gunfire as the security services shoot into the crowd and panic-stricken people run seeking cover. A man in a checked shirt is left lying face down in the dust in the empty street, a stream of blood flowing from a bullet wound in his head.
In northern Yemen, government tanks and artillery pound the mountains trying to dislodge Shia rebels holding positions among the crags. Plumes of white smoke rise from exploding shells. Tribesmen not in uniform fighting on the government side sit behind their heavy machine guns and spray the hillsides with fire. A few miles away on a dusty piece of flat ground, thousands of refugees driven from their homes by the war cower in small overcrowded tents.
Nobody in the West paid much attention to violent incidents like these in Yemen last year, though both of those described above were recorded on film. The mounting crisis in the country attracted notice only when a Nigerian student is revealed to have been "trained" in Yemen by al-Qa'ida to detonate explosives in his underpants on a plane heading for Detroit. But this botched attack has led to the U.S. and Britain starting to become entangled in one of the more violent countries in the world.
The problems in Yemen are social, economic, and political, and stretch back to the civil war in the 1960s. Yet Gordon Brown believes solutions can be found by holding a one-day summit on Yemen to "tackle extremism."
The number of active members of al-Qa'ida in Yemen is small, only 200 to 300 lightly armed militants in a country of 22 million people estimated to own no fewer than 60 million weapons. Al-Qa'ida has room to operate because the central government's authority barely extends outside the cities and because it can ally itself with the many opponents of President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who has been in office since the 1970s.
The power of al-Qa'ida is not its military expertise or sinister training camps in the mountains of Yemen. Rather, its strength is its ability to lure the U.S. and Britain into commitments in dangerous countries such as Yemen, Afghanistan, and Iraq, where the state is weak and its rule contested. It can do this because, in the wake of 9/11, the U.S. instinctively overreacts to the most amateur and unsuccessful attack on the homeland.
Al-Qa'ida has always had some activists in Yemen. In 2000, they rammed the USS Cole in Aden's harbour with a boat packed with explosives and ripped a hole in its hull, killing 17 American sailors. The Yemeni government agreed a secret truce with the group, under which it was not pursued if it carried out no more attacks. In 2006, al-Qa'ida began to reorganize in Yemen when 23 of its militants escaped from Sanaa jail. And as al-Qa'ida members came under greater pressure in Saudi Arabia, some fled to Yemen and set up a joint Saudi-Yemeni movement, al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP)
It is easy to see why AQAP finds Yemen a hospitable place. It is not a country where the state expects to have a monopoly of violence or authority. Long before 9/11, I used to be intrigued by the Yemeni authorities' attitude to personal weapons as exemplified by security measures at Sanaa airport. These were very strict, with all luggage X-rayed before being allowed into the airport building and X-rayed again at each stage of its journey to the plane. Passengers were given frequent body searches until they reached the departure lounge. This, as in most airports, had many shops selling local handicrafts and curios to travellers.
The difference in Sanaa airport was that many of these items turned out to be swords and long curved knives. Discovering to their horror that many passengers were carrying such weapons, Western airlines had to get their own flight crews to ask Yemenis, as they boarded the plane, if they were armed. Yemenis found it a strange question, but dutifully handed over their daggers to be placed in plastic bags in the hold of the aircraft.
The U.S. and Britain are about to increase their support for a government which is highly unpopular and engaged in a series of actual or potential civil wars. The heaviest fighting so far has been with the Zaydi Shia insurgents just south of the border with Saudi Arabia. They claim they are fighting discrimination and are responding to President Saleh's dependence on Saudi Arabia and its extreme Sunni Wahhabism. President Saleh has been portraying the Shia rebels as pawns of Iran, although his government has produced no evidence for this.
The dilemma for the U.S. and Britain is that, as they become more openly supportive of the Yemeni government, they will be targeted as its sponsors by its many enemies. The south of the country, independent until 1990 and defeated in a civil war in 1994, is seething with rebellion. Government forces shoot at protesters. There have been many shootings and arrests, and torture is endemic. "They can make a zebra say it is a gazelle" is a chilling Yemeni saying of the government's interrogation methods.
Southern newspapers have been shut down, including Al Ayyam, which is the most widely read. Hisham Bashraheel, its 66-year-old editor, was arrested last Wednesday at his newspaper office in the Crater district of Aden, after a protest against its closure last May when the paper was accused of supporting separatism. Some 30 protesters and 20 guards had fought a battle with the police in which one policeman and one guard were killed. They later gave themselves up.
I met Mr. Bashraheel in the cluttered office of Al Ayyam some years ago when he was already engaged in daily skirmishes with the authorities. Sitting on a chair in his office was a man called Abdul Hakim Mahyub, with a long scar down the side of his face, to whom Mr. Bashraheel introduced me. He said Mr. Mahyub's story of how he came by the scar explained a lot about current tensions between north and south in Yemen.
Mr. Mahyub said he was a teacher in Aden and several weeks earlier he had an argument with a man laying pipes outside his school. As is common in Yemen, the pipe-layer had a knife in his belt. In the course of the argument, he drew it and stabbed Mr. Mahyub in the face, cutting through his cheek and into his tongue. His speech was affected and he found it difficult to continue teaching, but the reason he had come to Al Ayyam to complain was that he had just heard that the man who stabbed him, who came from Marib in northern Yemen, had been released by an official from the same province. Mr. Bashraheel said that favoritism towards northerners was becoming very common, but for publishing Mr. Mahyub's story he risked being accused of "separatism" and stirring up hostility between north and south.
The U.S. and Britain will face a similar difficulty in Yemen as they already do in Afghanistan. They will be supporting an unpopular and corrupt government. It is not that al-Qa'ida is strong, but that it is swimming in sympathetic waters because the government is weak.
The government can see the danger of being labelled as an American pawn if it is too openly welcoming to foreign military aid. "Any intervention or direct military action by the U.S. could strengthen the al-Qa'ida network, not weaken it," the Deputy Prime Minister for Defense and Security Affairs, Rashad al-Alimi, said last week. The government would have liked to take all the aid it could get but without telling anybody.
All this sounds like Afghanistan. And there is a further way in which the two countries resemble each other. Just as Pakistan believes it is crucially affected by what happens in Afghanistan, so Saudi Arabia regards the future of Yemen as a vital interest. Saudi Arabia is by far the most important foreign power in Yemen, providing $2bn (£1.2bn) in budget support, but its interest has always been in a weak government in Sanaa and one over which it can exercise some control.
The only way that the U.S. and Britain could squeeze out al-Qa'ida from Yemen entirely is by strengthening the armed forces to the point at which the central government could take over parts of the country it has not ruled for decades. But this would provoke communities that exist in a state of semi-independence from the state. As in Afghanistan, foreign intervention in Yemen would soon create a counterreaction of which al-Qa'ida would be able to take advantage.