On Friday, Gary Hart, 71, issued a severe rebuke to the Clinton campaign.  --  The former Colorado senator, it should be pointed out, is no political naïf.  --  He is a veteran of several presidential campaigns, having run George McGovern's campaign in 1972 and having himself run for president in 1984, 1988, and 2004.  --  In disputing Barack Obama's readiness to be commander in chief, Hillary Clinton has, Hart said, broken one of the unwritten rules of politics:   "Do not provide ammunition to the opposition party that can be used to destroy your party's nominee."  --  These tactics are not politics as usual, in Hart's view.  --  They represent, rather, "raw, unrestrained ambition for power that cannot accept the will of the voters."  --  He concluded:  "Senator Obama is right to say the issue is judgment not years in Washington.  If Mrs. Clinton loses the nomination, her failure will be traced to the date she voted to empower George W. Bush to invade Iraq.  That is not the kind of judgment, or wisdom, required by the leader answering the phone in the night.  For her now to claim that Senator Obama is not qualified to answer the crisis phone is the height of irony if not chutzpah, and calls into question whether her primary loyalty is to the Democratic party and the nation or to her own ambition."  --  On Sunday, Hart's comment was listed as one of the most popular commentaries on the Huffington Post web site, with more than 100,000 views and more than 1,200 comments posted....

1.

The blogs

Gary Hart

BREAKING THE FINAL RULE
By Gary Hart

Huffington Post
March 7, 2008

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gary-hart/breaking-the-final-rule_b_90420.html

It will come as a surprise to many people that there are rules in politics. Most of those rules are unwritten and are based on common understandings, acceptable practices, and the best interest of the political party a candidate seeks to lead. One of those rules is this: Do not provide ammunition to the opposition party that can be used to destroy your party's nominee. This is a hyper-truth where the presidential contest is concerned.

By saying that only she and John McCain are qualified to lead the country, particularly in times of crisis, Hillary Clinton has broken that rule, severely damaged the Democratic candidate who may well be the party's nominee, and, perhaps most ominously, revealed the unlimited lengths to which she will go to achieve power. She has essentially said that the Democratic party deserves to lose unless it nominates her.

As a veteran of red telephone ads and "where's the beef" cleverness, I am keenly aware that sharp elbows get thrown by those trailing in the fourth quarter (and sometimes even earlier). "Politics ain't beanbag," is the old slogan. But that does not mean that it must also be rule-or-ruin, me-first-and-only-me, my way or the highway. That is not politics. That is raw, unrestrained ambition for power that cannot accept the will of the voters.

Senator Obama is right to say the issue is judgment not years in Washington. If Mrs. Clinton loses the nomination, her failure will be traced to the date she voted to empower George W. Bush to invade Iraq. That is not the kind of judgment, or wisdom, required by the leader answering the phone in the night. For her now to claim that Senator Obama is not qualified to answer the crisis phone is the height of irony if not chutzpah, and calls into question whether her primary loyalty is to the Democratic party and the nation or to her own ambition.