The director of Project Censored at Sonoma State University proposed in December 2006 the idea of a "national boycott to impeach for peace" as an activist idea that might actually affect a political process that seems impervious to ordinary forms of political influence available to ordinary citizens:  writing, calling, petitioning, marches, rallies, and voting.  --  The idea was embraced by a national coalition that on Jan. 1, 2007, issued a call for "a nationwide boycott of all consumer activity for one week in April," from Tax Day (Apr. 15) to Earth Day (Apr. 22).[1]  --  The group has established a web site with a variety of related materials.  --  A Newsweek poll conducted in October 2006 showed that "47 percent of Democrats say that should be a “top priority,” but only 28 percent of all Americans say it should be, 23 percent say it should be a lower priority, and nearly half, 44 percent, say it should not be done.  (Five percent of Republicans say it should be a top priority and 15 percent of Republicans say it should be a lower priority; 78 percent oppose impeachment.)"  --  A January 2006 Zogby poll showed that "52% [of Americans] agreed with the statement:  'If President Bush wiretapped American citizens without the approval of a judge, do you agree or disagree that Congress should consider holding him accountable through impeachment.'  --  A October 2005 Zogby poll showed that "50% agreed with the statement: 'If President Bush did not tell the truth about his reasons for going to war with Iraq, Congress should consider holding him accountable by impeaching him.'" ...

1.

NATIONAL BOYCOTT TO IMPEACH FOR PEACE

** Tax Day (April 15) till Earth Day (April 22) **

http://www.wearenotbuyingit.org/

January 1, 2007 -- A national coaltion of citizens, including war veterans, distinguished academics, students, journalists, artists, and elected officials have joined with us to call for a nationwide boycott of all consumer activity, for one week in April.

The organizers of the boycott have recognized the fact, that our elected representatives have been unwilling to move forward on the public's overwhelming demands for impeachment and an end to the war in Iraq.

This boycott is a way of unifying the opposition to the Bush Administration; and according to Dr. Peter Phillips, who was the first to propose the idea in December, "could well be the straw that broke the camel's back".

The boycott has been called in response to the statement by the new Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, that the issue of impeachment was "off the table."

One of the leading researchers into the agenda and actions of the Bush Administration, Dr. Peter Phillips, the Director of Project Censored at Sonoma State University, proposed a new tactic in the ongoing campaign to hold the administration, their neo-conservative backers, spin doctors, consultants, and henchmen accountable.

It is the belief of the organizers that this Administration must be held to task for the host of charges that have been levied against them. Dr.Phillips, a professor of sociology, has spent his professional career investigating the origins and purposes of the "Power Elite" in general, and neo-conservatives in particular.

Phillips struck upon the use of a boycott as a means to draw together all of those who oppose this administration and their policies. We can not simply rely on the work of progressive activists. We must bring together all citizens who feel strongly that crimes have been committed and an accounting is due.

A boycott is simply a form of non-violent resistance. By simuntaneously withdrawing our support from the economy, millions of people can have a dramatic impact on the policies of individual corporations and even national governments. In 1990, ACT UP staged a boycott of Phillip Morris that resulted in providing millions of dollars for AIDS research.

In 1994, a boycott waged against Shell Oil, Kellogg's, and Coca-Cola, helped to increase the momentum of the anti-apartheid movement. In 1995, the International Peace Bureau called for a boycott of all French products in oppositioon to nuclear testing. The French wine industry was especially hard hit and the threat of "economic disruption" spurred President Chirac to sign the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

National polls now show that well over half of ALL Americans believe that this administration should be impeached. A much higher percentage want to see this war end and virtually everyone wants to know the truth behind the events of the last 7 years.

What the people want, and what they get, can be two entirely different things if left up to the consideration of career politicians.

The marches, books, movies, lectures, and petitions all speak directly to the politicians . . . and they aren't listening. So let's put pressure on the people they do listen to 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

The boycott provides us with a way to send a wake-up call to the corporate backers of our political leaders. America, holding back on our spending for even one week will show the corporate powers that the people are serious, we are determined, and "We're not buying it anymore." To that end, we are building a network of individuals and organizations from coast to coast and around the world to support this action.

By uniting the work of so many millions of people into a single week of protest in which we make sure that the money talks loud and clear, we can give fair warning to our representatives that the time for truth has come, justice is demanded and a full accounting is expected from Washington and Wall Street.