On Friday, June 4, 2004, United States Representative Adam Smith met a delegation of seven members of United for Peace of Pierce County at his offices in the Federal Building in downtown Tacoma to discuss UFPPC's call for investigations into a pattern of illegal conduct on the part of high officials of the Bush administration. For details see the report below, as well as the text of the letter the delegation left with Rep. Smith....
REPORT ON A MEETING WITH REP. ADAM SMITH (D-WA, 9th DISTRICT) By
Mark Jensen
United for Peace of Pierce County June 4, 2004
This afternoon Representative Adam Smith (D-WA, 9th District) received a
delegation of seven members of United for Peace of Pierce County in his offices
in the Federal Building in Tacoma, Washington: Doug Brewer, Bill Evans, M.J.
Ewing, Mark Jensen, Burk Ketcham, Ted Nation, and Kristi Nebel.
UFPPC had requested the meeting at the prompting of the national coalition to
which it belongs, United for Peace and Justice, which called on member
groups to organize meetings with Congressional representatives. Kristi Nebel
arranged and coordinated the meeting. Members handed him the letter reproduced
below, which is based on UFPPC's "Statement on the Abu Ghraib prison abuses and a pattern
of illegal conduct," adopted on May 13, 2004, calling for
Congressional and judicial investigations into a pattern of illegal conduct for
which high officials of the Bush administration appear to be responsible, as
well as a copy of the statement itself.
Adam Smith said that he shared many of the values and concerns of UFPPC,
including the right to dissent, but that at present there is no prospect of the
sort of investigations we would like to see, since both houses of Congress are
controlled by Republicans. He said he did not believe there are enough moderate
Republicans to overcome this partisan obstacle. "There are no moderate
Republicans in Congress," he said, perhaps hyperbolically.
Rep. Smith characterized himself as "intensely practical," and so declined to
promise that he would take additional steps to try to bring about the
investigations into the violations of the U.S. Code, the U.S. Constitution, and
international covenants and conventions to which the United States is a
signatory to which the letter from the UFPPC delegation refers, despite the fact
that the United States House of Representatives possesses, under Article I,
Section II of the U.S. Constitution, "the sole power of impeachment" by which
"the President, Vice-President and all civil officers of the United States" can
be held to their constitutional duty to "take care that the laws be faithfully
executed" (hence the expression "the executive branch"). If he had the power
alone, Rep. Smith allowed, things might be different.
The administration's claim that it has legal authority to hold persons as
"enemy combatants" outside the scope of any judicial or legal oversight is a
matter of special concern to him, said Rep. Smith, who said that he was
interested in introducing legislation that would guarantee such individuals some
rights. The UFPPC delegation pointed out that the Bush administration argues
that the president's authority in this domain issues from his "plenary power" as
"commander in chief" in wartime, so the administration would regard such
legislation as unconstitutional -- an egregious twisting of the philosophy of
which the U.S. Constitution is the expression that exemplifies the very pattern
of illegal conduct that gave rise to our discussion.
A point of difference emerged in our discussion of the "war on terrorism."
Rep. Smith endorses this war. UFPPC, however, argues that the concept of war is
disastrously misplaced in the context of international terrorism, and that the
"war" being waged is more likely to produce additional terrorists than to "win"
the war. (See UFPPC's March 25 statement "On Iraq and the 'war on terrorism'" for
a fuller exposition of these views.) Furthermore, since what is being fought is
an amorphous ideology that inspires individuals and groups that make up loose
amalgamations that are not true "organizations" with "members" that can be
clearly identified, the "war on terrorism" is in fact a recipe for an endless
war whose prosecution has the potential of changing unnecessarily the very
nature of our own free and open society. Furthermore, members of the delegation
argued that the concept of "war" implies that there is a military solution,
which is not the case in the struggle against transnational terrorist groups.
Rep. Smith agreed that the war that is being waged is not really "against
terrorism," but against a particular sort of terrorism, but this was as far he
went toward addressing our concerns about the "war on terror." Acknowledging
that he did not agree with UFPPC on all points, he said, nevertheless, that the
defeat of George W. Bush in the November 2, 2004, presidential election would go
far toward making progress on UFPPC's fundamental concerns: respect for human
rights and support for international law through multilateral diplomacy. He said
that this effort was the main focus of his current activity.
The UFPPC delegation expressed to Rep. Smith its appreciation for his
willingness to meet and discuss our mutual concerns.
-- LETTER FROM A DELEGATION OF UNITED FOR PEACE OF PIERCE COUNTY TO
UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE ADAM SMITH OF WASHINGTON STATE, NINTH CONGRESSIONAL
DISTRICT
June 4, 2004
The Honorable Adam Smith United States House of
Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515
Dear Representative Smith:
Thank you for receiving us today as a delegation from UNITED FOR PEACE OF
PIERCE COUNTY, a group of Pierce County residents dedicated to opposing
nonviolently our nation's reliance on unilateral military actions, and to
supporting the exercise of cooperative diplomacy in the spirit of international
law and in favor of human rights.
We meet on the eve of the 60th anniversary of D-Day, an occasion that makes
more timely our desire to reaffirm ideals that were articulated as national
policies in the aftermath of World War II in documents like the United Nations
Charter and the Geneva Conventions.
The honor, safety, and security of our nation require that the rule of law be
upheld and that human rights be respected. We expect those acting in the name of
the United States of America to respect human rights and to uphold the rule of
law.
On May 13, UNITED FOR PEACE OF PIERCE COUNTY adopted a 2-page statement
entitled "On the Abu Ghraib Prison Abuses and a Pattern of Illegal Conduct." Our
wish to meet and talk with you springs from our desire to urge you, as a member
of the United States House of Representatives representing residents of Pierce
County, to do all you can to seek the investigations for which this statement
calls.
We believe that Congress should investigate whether the present
administration has deliberately violated the U.S. Code, the U.S. Constitution,
and international covenants and conventions to which the United States is a
signatory.
In particular, we believe that there is reason to believe that
- by devising a policy to ignore the Geneva Convention protections of Iraqis
regarded by the U.S. military as potential sources of useful information,
- by holding prisoners at Naval Base Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and elsewhere in
undisclosed locations, as persons with no juridical status, such locations being
outside the borders of the United States and the individuals being considered
"enemy combatants," and
- by misusing provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act and applying them in areas
that have nothing to do with fighting terrorism,
high officials in the Bush administration may well be guilty of violations of
the law.
We need not remind you that under the Constitution of the United States the
president is charged to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed" (U.S.
Constitution, Article II, Section III), having taken a solemn oath to
"faithfully execute the office" and, to the best of his ability, "preserve,
protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States" (Article II, Section
I), or that the Constitution entrusts to the House of Representatives of which
you are a member "the sole power of impeachment" (Article I, Section II), to
which "the President, Vice-President and all civil officers of the United
States" are subject (Article II, Section IV).
It is our request that you, as the Representative of many residents of Pierce
County who share these views, do all in your power to ensure that thorough
investigations by appropriate legislative and judicial bodies delve into these
matters.
We attach the full May 13, 2004, statement adopted by UNITED FOR PEACE OF
PIERCE COUNTY for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Doug Brewer Bill Evans M.J. Ewing Mark Jensen Burk Ketcham Ted
Nation Kristi Nebel |