By arranging for House Republicans to introduce a resolution that could not be amended, limiting debate to ten hours, and arranging for the Pentagon to distribute "a highly unusual 'debate prep book' filled with ready-made answers for criticism of the war, the White House succeeded on Thursday in making a mockery of American constitutional government that was designed to trap Democrats in appearing to not "support the troops" in Iraq.  --  The resolution passed, but Democrats managed to express strong criticism of the war anyway, Liz Sidoti of the Associated Press reported.[1]  --  Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA 8th) called the Iraq war "a grotesque mistake" and said:  "The administration continues to dig a hole.  They refuse to come up and see the light."  --  John Murtha (D-PA 12th) said:  "Stay and we'll pay," criticizing "the failed policy of this administration" and lamenting the thousands of lives lost, billions of dollars spent, and the begrimed U.S. image since the Iraq war started.  --  "It's time to redeploy and be ready," Murtha said....



By Liz Sidoti

** Congress launches into new, impassioned debate on the Iraq war. **

Associated Press
June 15, 2006

[PHOTO CAPTION: Iraqi soldiers carry exhausted recently-released prisoner Abdul-Kader from Ramadi at the main bus station in Baghdad, Iraq Thursday, June 15, 2006. More than 450 prisoners were being released Thursday as part of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's national reconciliation efforts, according to the U.S. military.]

WASHINGTON -- The House erupted in impassioned election-year debate over the Iraq war on Thursday, Republicans defending the conflict as key to winning the global struggle against terrorism while Democrats excoriated President Bush and his policies.

"We must stand firm in our commitment to fight terrorism and the evil it inflicts throughout the world. We must renew our resolve that the actions of evildoers will not dictate American policy," House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., said in remarks laden with references to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

The war was "a grotesque mistake," countered the Democratic leader, Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California. "The administration continues to dig a hole. They refuse to come up and see the light," she said.

Choreographed by the GOP, the debate unfolded four months before midterm elections that will decide the control of Congress. The administration, for its part, was so determined to get its message out that the Pentagon distributed a highly unusual "debate prep book" filled with ready-made answers for criticism of the war.

Partisan lines were drawn quickly.

"Is it al-Qaida or is it America? Let the voters take note of this debate," said Republican Rep. Charles Norwood of Georgia, attacking war critics as defeatists who do not deserve re-election.

Countered Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick, D-Mich.: "America, listen. Look. Should we stay the course or should we have a plan of redeployment to protect our troops and to protect America?"

The United States has absorbed the deaths of 2,500 troops in the three-year conflict, which began when a U.S.-led invasion toppled Saddam Hussein, but quickly turned sour in the face of a brutal insurgency.

Reacting to the new milestone on combat deaths, White House press secretary Tony Snow said, "It's a number." He said that Bush "feels very deeply the pain that the families feel." As the updated death toll was announced at the Pentagon, the House and Senate held moments of silence.

Polls show the war has become unpopular. But Bush has tried to rally support in the days since the death of terror leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, and the recent completion of a new Iraqi government.

The Pentagon's 74-page battle plan for the debate says that "Iraq will become a haven for terrorists, murderers, and thugs," if the United States leaves "before the job is done."

"We cannot cut and run," it says at another point, anticipating Democratic calls for a troop withdrawal on a fixed timetable.

The Associated Press obtained a copy of the document. It was sent to both Republicans and Democrats and it laid out the administration's positions in strong terms and offered page after page of counterpoints to criticisms that Democrats typically level against Bush's war policies.

"In this fight for the future of peace, freedom, and democracy in the Middle East and around the globe, winning should be our only option," said Rep. Phil Gingrey, R-Ga.

"Stay and we'll pay," countered Rep. John Murtha, D-Pa., who criticized "the failed policy of this administration" and lamented the lives lost, billions of dollars spent and the bruised U.S. image since the war started. "It's time to redeploy and be ready," he said.

Republicans arranged for the debate to culminate in a vote either later Thursday or Friday on legislation a resolution that labels the Iraq war part of the larger global fight against terrorism and says an "arbitrary date for the withdrawal or redeployment" of troops is not in the national interest.

Across the Capitol, partisan tensions on the Iraq war were clear as the Senate sent the president another $66 billion for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and debated annual military legislation. Sen. John Kerry, the Democratic Party presidential candidate in 2004 and a potential 2008 standard-bearer, was expected to introduce an amendment that calls for the administration to redeploy combat forces from that war zone by year's end.

As the death toll and price tag of Iraq rise, opinion polls show voters are frustrated with the war and favor Democrats to control Congress instead of the Republicans who now run the show.

Sensitive to those political realities, House Republicans sought to put lawmakers of both parties on record on an issue certain to be central in this fall's congressional elections.

Democrats decried the debate as a sham. They said Republicans promised an open discussion but, instead, stacked the deck in their own favor by limiting debate to 10 hours and barring any amendments.

"Republicans offer a political document, just before the fall elections," Rep. Ron Kind, D-Wis., said. Added Rep. Tom Lantos, D-Calif.: "They are forcing us into a charade."

They also complained that Republicans refused to allow them to present an alternative resolution. But even though they tried, Democrats weren't able to agree on such an alternative.

In both the House and Senate, Democrats appear to be divided into three camps. Some want troops to leave Iraq this year. Others object to setting any kind of timetable. A number of them want the United States to start redeploying forces by year's end but don't want to set a date when all troops should be out.

House Democrats are mindful that voting against such a resolution could leave them vulnerable to attacks by Republicans who could claim that Democrats who opposed the resolution don't support U.S. troops and advocate a "cut-and-run" strategy.

To that end, a memo this week by House Majority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, urged his fellow Republicans to frame the debate as "a portrait of contrasts between Republicans and Democrats."

Republican leaders portray the debate as the first of its kind since the Iraq war started in 2003. But they staged a similar vote on a resolution rejecting the immediate withdrawal of troops last year after Murtha, in a reversal, called for a quick exit from Iraq.