On Thursday, as Iraqis went to the polls, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA 8th) met with the editors and reporters of the Washington Post.[1] -- Speaking about the Iraq war, she put the best face she could on the inability of the Democratic Party to come out clearly against the war -- something that must be frustrating to Pelosi. -- As reporter Dan Balz pointed out, from the beginning she "opposed the war and, as the senior Democrat on the intelligence committee before the invasion, argued that Saddam Hussein posed no imminent threat to the United States," and on Oct. 10, 2002, "rallied 126 Democratic votes against [House Joint Resolution 114, authorizing the use of U.S. military force against Iraq] when then-Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.), the Democratic leader, supported the White House." -- Since the Democratic Party firmly supports the U.S. national security state and is supported by the same interests that benefit financially from the occupation of Iraq and the war on terrorism, it comes as little surprise that the Democratic Party lacks the moral and political gumption to oppose them outright. -- But according to the Post, Pelosi's position that the war on Iraq is a matter of "individual conscience" was a stance that "cheered the party's antiwar activists who want party leaders to challenge Bush more vigorously on the war," while it "angered some Democrats, who believed it left the party vulnerable to criticism from the Republicans." -- In her talk with the Post, reporter Dan Balz said that the 65-year-old former advertising executive, now in her ninth term in Congress, who grew up in a political family in Maryland (both her father and her brother have served as mayor of Baltimore), "labeled the Republican-controlled Congress 'the most corrupt in history' and repeated her assertion that Democrats will make ethics a central issue next year." ...
Politics
PELOSI HAILS DEMOCRATS' DIVERSE WAR STANCES
By Dan Balz
Washington Post
December 16, 2005
Page A23
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/15/AR2005121501814_pf.html
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said yesterday that Democrats should not seek a unified position on an exit strategy in Iraq, calling the war a matter of individual conscience and saying differing positions within the caucus are a source of strength for the party.
Pelosi said Democrats will produce an issue agenda for the 2006 elections but it will not include a position on Iraq. There is consensus within the party that President Bush has mismanaged the war and that a new course is needed, but House Democrats should be free to take individual positions, she sad.
"There is no one Democratic voice . . . and there is no one Democratic position," Pelosi said in an interview with Washington Post reporters and editors.
Pelosi recently endorsed the proposal by Rep. John P. Murtha (D-Pa.) for a swift redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq over a period of six months, but no other party leader followed, and House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.) publicly opposed her.
She said her support for Murtha was not intended to forge a Democratic position on the war, adding that she blocked an effort by some of her colleagues to put the Democrats on record backing Murtha.
Her comments ruling out a caucus position appeared to put Pelosi at odds with some other party officials. Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean recently said Democrats were beginning to coalesce around a strategy that would pull out all troops over the next two years. Rep. Rahm Emanuel (Ill.), chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said on the day Murtha offered his plan, "As for Iraq policy, at the right time, we'll have a position."
Pelosi, one of the most liberal Democrats in the House, opposed the war and, as the senior Democrat on the intelligence committee before the invasion, argued that Saddam Hussein posed no imminent threat to the United States. She served as Democratic whip when Congress authorized Bush to go to war, and she rallied 126 Democratic votes against the measure when then-Rep. Richard A. Gephardt (Mo.), the Democratic leader, supported the White House.
Pelosi said she had not consulted with Dean or Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) before taking her position. Her action angered some Democrats, who believed it left the party vulnerable to criticism from the Republicans, but cheered the party's antiwar activists who want party leaders to challenge Bush more vigorously on the war.
Meanwhile, House Republicans are planning to seek a vote as early as today on a resolution saying that an "artificial timetable" for the withdrawal of troops is "fundamentally inconsistent with achieving victory in Iraq."
In a wide-ranging interview, Pelosi labeled the Republican-controlled Congress "the most corrupt in history" and repeated her assertion that Democrats will make ethics a central issue next year. She said that the issue and ethical climate in the country point to Democratic gains next year, and noted that if the elections were held today, Democrats would take control of the House.
If Democrats are able to win the majority next year, Pelosi pledged aggressive oversight of the administration on issues including the war, intelligence, and how the government responded to Hurricane Katrina.
Pelosi said Democrats scored significant victories recently, the biggest coming on Social Security, on which she said Democratic opposition to Bush's proposed private or personal accounts blocked any hopes the White House had for changing the government retirement insurance program this year.
"Not only did we take him down on that, but we took down a lot of his credibility as being somebody who cared about 'people like me,'" she said.
|
