border border border border
border
border border

United for Peace
"We nonviolently oppose the reliance on unilateral military actions rather than cooperative diplomacy."
  arrow     
border borderborder border

Main Menu
Home
Local News
US & World News
Book Notes
Humor
Quotations
UFPPC Statements
UFPPC Activities
- - - - - - -
The Web Links
Administrator
UFPPC Links
Support UFPPC:
Login Form





Lost Password?
No account yet? Register
Hit Counter
Visitors: 9924569
NEWS: IISS predicts escalating civil war, large US troop presence in Iraq for years Print E-mail
Written by Henry Adams   
Sunday, 30 October 2005

Back in February 2004, Tom Engelhardt quoted a CIA report that said Iraq was on "a glide path to civil war."  --  This article in last Wednesday's Financial Times suggests the prognostication was right on target.  --  The director of the International Institute for Strategic Studies, a London think tank, "warned that there could be an escalation in the conflict between the military arms of the two dominant Shia groups in the south of the country, because of a 'fracturing' of the Shia vote," the Financial Times reported.  --  "He added that the poll could be also hit by a Sunni boycott similar to the one that afflicted the country's January parliamentary vote.  Such a development could undermine the stability and legitimacy of any new government."  --  As for the United States, IISS said it expects that U.S. to still have massive numbers of troops in Iraq even after Bush leaves office.  --  The IISS also estimated that the mercenaries (or, as they are referred to by the Financial Times, "private security personnel") are now the second-largest contingent of foreign fighters in Iraq, after the U.S....

Middle East & Africa

U.S. WARNED ON LONG PRESENCE IN IRAQ AS CONSTITUTION APPROVED BY SLIM MAJORITY
By Daniel Dombey (Brussels), James Boxell (London), and Steve Negus (Baghdad)

Financial Times (UK)
October 26, 2005

http://news.ft.com/cms/s/93e20626-45be-11da-981b-00000e2511c8.html

The U.S. will likely have to retain a sizeable military force in Iraq even after President George W. Bush has left the White House, a leading London-based defense think-tank said yesterday.

On the day the number of U.S. soldiers killed in the conflict reached 2,000, the International Institute for Strategic Studies, which publishes a comprehensive account of military forces around the world, said that plans by the U.S. to shift combating insurgency to Iraq's own army had not yet borne fruit, while rebels were showing considerable resilience.

Yesterday, a sergeant died of wounds suffered in a bomb attack on October 17, bringing the death toll for the U.S. military to 2,000.

The IISS report came as Iraq approved its new constitution by a slim margin in a referendum, with strong votes against the charter in Sunni provinces. "The next U.S. administration will have forces in Iraq, and a fairly large number for some years to come," said Patrick Cronin, director of studies at the institute.

He said that U.S. troop withdrawals next year were likely only to be small scale and that it would take "five years at least" for Iraq to generate the 300,000-strong army it needed to fight the insurgency on its own.

Mr. Cronin said the U.S. would need to maintain a substantial part of its 150,000 force in the country, even though private security contractors are playing a greater role. The IISS estimates that private security personnel are now the second-largest foreign contingent in Iraq after the U.S., and comprising a force more than double the size of Britain's 8,500-strong contingent.

Gen. George Casey, the top U.S. commander in Iraq, said this month that problems with Sunni resistance to the constitution could call into question plans for "fairly substantial" troop withdrawals early next year.

Yesterday, John Chipman, IISS director, warned that there could be an escalation in the conflict between the military arms of the two dominant Shia groups in the south of the country, because of a "fracturing" of the Shia vote.

He added that the poll could be also hit by a Sunni boycott similar to the one that afflicted the country's January parliamentary vote. Such a development could undermine the stability and legitimacy of any new government.

The IISS also claimed yesterday that China spent $62.5bn on defence last year, compared with the government's official figure of $25bn. The report comes on the heels of warnings by Donald Rumsfeld, defence secretary, in China last week that the U.S. and other countries are increasingly concerned about the size of the Chinese military budget.

The IISS has not yet estimated Chinese military spending for this year, but the Pentagon estimates that it could be as much as $90bn.


Last Updated ( Sunday, 30 October 2005 )
 
< Prev   Next >


go to top Go To Top go to top
border borderborder border
     
border
powered by mambo OS
border
border border
border border border border
border border border border
© 2009 United for Peace of Pierce County, WA - We nonviolently oppose the reliance on unilateral military actions rather than cooperative diplomacy.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.