In an administration where all policy is political, it's no surprise that Republican-led Senate committees refused to conduct hearings on U.S. waste and bungling in Iraq. -- (Prof. Robert Brent Toplin says the shameless, unprincipled partisanship of the party in power in Congress is from a historical point of view the most important factor differentiating the situation the anti-Iraq war opposition faces from that faced by the anti-Vietnam war opposition in the 1960s.) -- So Sen. Byron Dorgan held the Senate Democratic Policy Committee hold hearings. -- "Perhaps billions of dollars have been wasted and pilfered," he says....
News
Nation
Washington
FORMER JOURNALISM ADVISER SAYS U.S. OFFICIALS STEERED COVERAGE TO
THEMSELVES By Larry Margasak
Associated Press February 14, 2005
http://www.boston.com/dailynews/045/wash/Former_journalism_adviser_in_I:.shtml
WASHINGTON -- A journalist who helped Iraq form a new broadcast
network in 2003 testified Monday that U.S. occupation officials were more
interested in airing their own activities than stories essential to Iraqis.
Don North, who served as a U.S. government adviser to the Iraqi Media
Network, said the network became an irrelevant mouthpiece for the U.S. Coalition
Provisional Authority.
The network was given "a laundry list of CPA activities" to cover instead of
stories on security, the lack of electricity and jobs, said North, an
independent journalist who has reported for National Public Radio and NBC.
North testified at a hearing of the Senate Democratic Policy Committee, a
party organization. Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., head of the panel, said Democrats
had asked Republican-led Senate committees to conduct hearings on U.S. waste and
missteps in Iraq but the GOP chairmen refused.
In addition to North, another former U.S. adviser in Iraq Frank Willis
testified he thought he was in the Wild West in 2003 as he watched colleagues
pull $2 million in fresh bills from a vault and stuff them in a contractor's
gunnysack.
North told the hearing he wanted the media network to be like the Public
Broadcasting System in the United States. Instead, he said, U.S. authorities
told him "we were running a public diplomacy operation" for the occupation
government.
Willis testified that cash payments that weren't stuffed in sacks were made
from a pickup truck that bore the name of Iraq's grounded airline. American
authorities thought the vehicle would "meld into the environment," Willis, said.
Much of the money was Iraqi funds, Willis said.
Army Lt. Col. Joseph Yoswa, a Defense Department spokesman, said the
occupation authority "strived earnestly for sound management, transparency and
oversight." He said U.S. funds were subject to "contract and accounting
practices required by U.S. law." Separate standards applied to the Iraqi money,
he said.
Yoswa said he could not comment on the testimony about the Iraqi media.
Monday's hearing was designed to spotlight the waste of money in Iraq by the
former occupation agency, the Coalition Provisional Authority.
Because Iraq had no functioning banking system in 2003, money was kept in a
basement vault in CPA headquarters, a former palace of Saddam Hussein.
Officials from the CPA, which ruled Iraq from June 2003 to June 2004, would
count the money when it left the vault, but nobody kept track of the cash after
that, Willis said.
"In sum: inexperienced officials, fear of decision-making, lack of
communications, minimal security, no banks and lots of money to spread around.
This chaos I have referred to as a 'Wild West,'" Willis said in testimony
submitted to the Democratic Policy Committee.
"This isn't penny ante. Millions, perhaps billions of dollars have been
wasted and pilfered," said the chairman of the Democratic panel, Sen. Byron
Dorgan of North Dakota. He said the hearing was arranged because the Republicans
who run Congress have declined to investigate fraud, waste and abuse in Iraq.
James Mitchell, spokesman for the special inspector general for Iraq
reconstruction, said in an interview that cash payments in Iraq were a problem
when the occupation authority ran the country, and they continue during the
massive U.S.-funded reconstruction.
"There are no capabilities to electronically transfer funds," Mitchell said.
"This complicates the financial management of reconstruction projects and
complicates our ability to follow the money."
The Pentagon, which had oversight of the CPA, did not comment in response to
requests Friday and over the weekend. But the administrator of the former U.S.
occupation agency, L. Paul Bremer, in response to a recent federal audit
criticizing the CPA, strongly defended the agency's financial practices.
Bremer said auditors mistakenly assumed that "Western-style budgeting and
accounting procedures could be immediately and fully implemented in the midst of
a war."
When the authority took over the country in 2003, Bremer said, there was no
functioning Iraqi government and services were primitive or nonexistent. He said
the U.S. strategy was "to transfer to the Iraqis as much responsibility as
possible as quickly as possible, including responsibility for the Iraqi budget."
Iraq's economy was "dead in the water" and the priority "was to get the
economy going," Bremer said.
Also in response to that audit, Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman had said,
"We simply disagree with the audit's conclusion that the CPA provided less than
adequate controls."
Willis, who served in the State and Transportation departments during the
Reagan administration, worked in Iraq during the last half of 2003 and said he
was responsible for civilian operations at Baghdad's airport.
Describing the transfer of $2 million to one contractor's gunnysack, Willis
said: "It was time for payment. We told them to come in and bring a bag." He
said the money went to Custer Battles of Middletown, R.I., for providing airport
security in Baghdad for civilian passengers.
Willis' allegations follow by two weeks an inspector general's report that
concluded the occupying authority transferred nearly $9 billion to Iraqi
government ministries without any financial controls.
The money was designated for financing humanitarian needs, economic
reconstruction, repair of facilities, disarmament and civil administration, but
the authority had no way to verify that it went for those purposes, the audit
said.
Willis concluded that "decisions were made that shouldn't have been,
contracts were made that were mistakes, and were poorly, if at all, supervised,
money was spent that could have been saved, if we simply had the right numbers
of people. . . . I believe the 500 or so at CPA headquarters should
have been 5,000."
|