A piece in the Aug. 27, 2004, Forward reports that Israel's ambassador to France, Nissim Zvili, wrote in June 2004 to the Israeli Foreign Ministry to warn that American Jewish groups' involvement in French politics could backfire and cause a "catastrophe." -- The American Israel Public Affairs Committeeís activities in France are causing concern, and the Forward also reported that the activities of the right-leaning Union des Patrons et des Professionnels Juifs de France or UPJF were creating tensions with the main French Jewish representative body, the Conseil Représentatif des Institutions Juives en France, known by its French acronym, CRIF....
News
ISRAELI ENVOY VEXED BY ROLE OF U.S. JEWS IN FRANCE By Marc Perelman
Forward August 27, 2004
http://www.forward.com/main/article.php?ref=perelman200408251022
The growing involvement of American Jewish groups in nascent pro-Israel
lobbying efforts in France is fueling concerns of a possible backlash among some
French Jewish leaders and Israeli officials.
In a letter to the Israeli Foreign Ministry two months ago, Israel's
ambassador to France, Nissim Zvili, warned about the potential negative
consequences if American Jewish groups are perceived as seeking to influence
French politics, the Forward has learned.
Several French Jewish leaders are echoing Zvili's concerns that any
perception of American Jewish money bankrolling politicians in France at a time
when anti-American and anti-Israel feelings are in vogue would eventually harm
French Jews.
Zvili, who was responding to a query from the Foreign Ministry following news
reports about such initiatives, stressed the need to take into consideration the
stark differences of mentality and political structures between France and the
United States, according to a source at the embassy. In his letter, Zvili also
wrote that reports of intervention by American groups are making French Jewish
leaders uncomfortable and could have a very negative impact on public opinion.
Citing a commonly heard fear in French Jewish circles, the embassy source
said: "American Jewish money funding a French electoral campaign would be a
catastrophe."
Zvili, the source said, has urged Israel to tell American Jewish groups to
proceed carefully. The source indicated that the message was approved in
Jerusalem and likely passed on to American Jewish groups.
Calls to the Foreign Ministry officials overseeing the issue were not
returned.
Much of the controversy has centered on an agreement reached last year
between the AJCongress and a vocal pro-Israel group called the Union of French
Jewish Employers and Professionals, known by its French acronym, UPJF. Concerns
are also being voiced about the European activities of the American Israel
Public Affairs Committee, the Washington pro-Israel lobbying organization, which
has developed ties with Jewish groups in France and other European countries to
encourage the development of American-style lobbying.
The American Jewish Committee also has stepped up its role in Europe in the
past year, but it appears to have avoided the sort of controversy surrounding
the other two American groups.
Under the agreement between the AJCongress and UPJF, the American group will
provide its French partner with advocacy training and advice, as well as
financial support.
David Twersky, the director of the AJCongress's newly formed Council for
World Jewry, confirmed the funding but declined to disclose its amount. So did
Herve Giaoui, UPJF's chairman.
The willingness of UPJF to support political candidates and engage in
political activism has triggered repeated spats with the main French Jewish
representative body, known by its French acronym, CRIF. Roger Cukierman, CRIF's
president, has criticized the AJCongress's agreement with UPJF. Now, UPJF's
political activities are fueling speculation in some circles that the new
agreement would bring the AJCongress into that arena.
"What you have here is a noxious mix of foreign money, political lobbying and
hawkish views," said Patrick Klugman, the former head of the French Jewish
student union and a board member of CRIF. "This will end up going against the
interests of the Jewish community."
But both the AJCongress and UPJF stressed that the cooperation agreement
between the two groups ruled out any role in French politics.
Twersky forcefully denied any suggestion that American Jewish monies were
being injected into French politics, stressing that the agreement between the
AJCongress and UPJF explicitly rules out political action as part of their
shared activities and exclusively focuses on efforts to fight antisemitism and
anti-Israeli perceptions. Giaoui said the American money would only serve to
finance pro-Israel advertising campaigns and, therefore, he was not concerned
about the potential perception of American Jewish meddling in French affairs.
Twersky also stressed that UPJF was moving to empower French Jews in a way
that umbrella groups such as CRIF could not.
"Political action is deemed the sole responsibility of UPJF," Twersky said,
adding that he advised the group not to take sides politically.
Examination of UPJF statements appears to show a pattern of support for
right-leaning candidates, reflecting what numerous observers, including some
officials of Israel's Labor party, say is a greater sensitivity on the French
right than on the left to issues of antisemitism.
In a June 24 letter to its members detailing the group's position on the
issue of support to political candidates, UPJF said it was "convinced that it is
imperative to become involved in the political life of our country, be it at the
local, national or European levels."
The June UPJF letter was meant to explain the organization's decision to
support the candidacy of Patrick Gaubert, a well-known Jewish anti-racist
leader, at a recent European Parliament election, as well as that of Laurent
Dominati, in a French parliamentary election in Paris. In addition, the group
has expressed strong support for presidential hopeful Nicolas Sarkozy. One of
the group's founders, Nicole Guedj, is now a junior minister in the government.
All four politicians are members of the conservative UMP party of President
Jacques Chirac.
Giaoui, the UPJF chairman, noted that the group also had supported a
communist candidate, as well as FranÁois Zimeray, a Socialist former member of
the European Parliament who has taken strong pro-Israel stances. However, he
acknowledged that the group's tendency was right leaning, adding that this was
reflective of a political shift in the Jewish community.
Giaoui said the group was openly encouraging Jews to donate funds to
pro-Israel candidates as a way for the Jewish community to regain its political
clout.
Observers noted that political financing in France is curtailed severely by
law, which only allows limited donations by individuals, and that politicians
tend to spend less money than their American counterparts. Moreover, the
president charts the country's foreign policy with very limited input from
legislators, rendering the funding of pro-Israel candidates at parliamentary or
local elections less useful.
Despite these obstacles to influencing government policy, UPJF's willingness
to endorse candidates and urge individuals to fund them has struck a chord among
a segment of French Jews.
"It is time for European Jewish communities to take their responsibilities in
terms of political action. We have to accept to play a more political role,"
said Zimeray, the former European legislator who last year set up his own
pro-Israel advocacy group in Brussels.
Zimeray said he would push such an agenda at CRIF, where he was just
appointed as the head of the political committee. Other CRIF officials said the
institution has to remain neutral because of its position as the official
interlocutor between France's government and its Jewish community.
Zimeray's organization, called Medbridge, is essentially trying to promote
Israel's image by using its network of relationships among European politicians.
Zimeray said he did not receive financial backing from American Jewish groups
but that he welcomed such financing on specific projects. For instance, he
received some money from the AJCommittee for a trip that brought more than 200
members of the European Parliament to Israel and Jordan last year.
However, in a clear allusion to Aipac, he warned against replicating U.S.
lobbying models in Europe.
"Some American Jewish groups just behave as if Europe was not different," he
said. "This is just a recipe for a catastrophe."
Aipac has been actively building relationships with a variety of Jewish
organizations in Paris and in Brussels, including another recently launched
Brussels-based pro-Israel advocacy group called the European Middle East Forum,
which was set up in 2002 by two French businessmen, Marc Grossman and Ronny
Bruckner.
An official with the European Middle East Forum said that Aipac provided
expertise but not financial support to the new group. The official added that
the group's funding comes essentially from private European donors, although
"one or two" private American donors contribute to its $2.2 million annual
budget.
"We absolutely do not want to be the European arm of an American
organization," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
The official added that the new group, which recently has opened branches in
the six European countries with the largest Jewish communities, was focused on
issuing policy memos and on organizing trips and meetings to improve Israel's
image in the eyes of European decision-makers.
The European Middle East Forum is encouraging its members to support
political candidates with, among other things, financial donations, but is
careful not to take positions as an organization.
"We are perceived as a Jewish lobby. It doesn't go down well. But so be it,"
the official said.
Aipac's willingness to engage a variety of Jewish groups has created some
tension with CRIF, which by law and tradition is considered the main voice of
French Jewry.
Last year, CRIF officials were baffled when UPJF was the only French Jewish
group invited to the Aipac annual conference. Although several Jewish groups
were invited this year, including CRIF, the tension still was palpable.
During a one-day training seminar with European Jewish leaders held on the
sidelines of the conference, Cukierman left the room after his request for more
speaking time was rebuffed by organizers, according to two people who were
present. They said the organizers had allotted more time for the presentation by
the European Middle East Forum.
Aipac officials did not return calls for comments.
One American-based group that seems to have avoided criticism while expanding
its European operations is the AJCommittee. In addition to funding trips to
Israel in coordination with local Jewish groups such as the one organized by
Medbridge, the AJCommittee opened a trans-Atlantic institute in Brussels and is
providing technical support through its network of European bureaus, the most
recent of which was opened in Paris.
David Harris, the AJCommittee's executive director, said the organization was
careful not to impinge on local Jewish turf. For example, he said, it has made a
point of bringing European Jewish leaders to its meetings with European
officials and of signing partnership agreements with umbrella organizations
rather than individual groups.
"We would not want to operate that way," Harris said. "U.S.-style lobbying
has to be adapted to the local conditions, and we Americans should keep in mind
what 'savoir-faire' and 'nuance' mean." |